View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Delivery Value Stream Mapping |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When delivery work dissolves into wait times, handoffs, and hidden effort, Value Stream Mapping makes the actual flow visible. The method exposes bottlenecks, idle time, and feedback loops so lead time and improvement levers become tangible. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 5-15 min | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-10 | 3-20 | 1-8 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Current-state map, Future-state map, Bottleneck list | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tagsno overlap | LeanFlowWasteDelivery | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ForecastingFlowDelivery | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |