View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research User Interviews | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction | ![]() Facilitation Lean Coffee | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. | When a group without a fixed agenda needs to get into useful conversations quickly, Lean Coffee structures the start around interests rather than a presentation. The group itself negotiates which topics get time first and which wait. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | 10-20 min je Frage | 30-90 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 6-50 | 3-20 | 15-200 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes | Prioritized Topics, Discussion Notes, Action Items | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | LearningDialogueFacilitation | FacilitationAutonomyDialogue | FacilitationLarge groupLearning |



