View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research User Interviews |  Innovation Brainstorming |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Innovation Rapid Ideation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When a decision needs to be prepared quickly, the method generates many solution-close variants in a short time. It deliberately relies on pace to undercut self-censorship and perfectionism. This quickly produces a usable field for prioritization and further work. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | 30-60 min | 30-60 min je Interview | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 4-12 | 5-12 Interviews | 1-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Ideenpool, Roh-Shortlist, Cluster |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | BrainstormingIdeationDivergenceSpeed |