methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a participant using a prototype while an observer takes notes beside a highlighted usability issue.
UX Research
Usability Testing
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Purposedifferent
When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h je Session20-45 min30-60 min je Interview30-60 min je Interview
Participantsdifferent
Based on research questionBased on research question5-12 Interviews5-10 Interviews
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Usability Issues, Severity List, RecommendationsContent groups, Label set, IA hypothesesProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsSolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes
Tagsno overlap
ValidationUXPrototype
Information architectureNavigationStructure
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
Add more methods