View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Usability TestingArchitecture Inception CanvasArchitecture Decision RecordSoftware Architecture Canvas
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Usability Testing | ![]() Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Architecture Software Architecture Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h je Session | 1-2 h | 15-45 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 3-8 | 1-3 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Usability Issues, Severity List, Recommendations | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Architecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality Attributes |
Tagsno overlap | ValidationUXPrototype | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop |



