methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Troika Consulting.
Facilitation
Troika Consulting
Paper illustration for World Café.
Facilitation
World Café
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Purposedifferent
When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands.When a group needs to connect many viewpoints in a short time, World Café creates a calm alternation between closeness and rotation. It sets thinking in motion without forcing the conversation into full-plenary rigidity.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-45 min60-180 min5-15 min10-20 min je Frage
Participantsdifferent
3-3012-100+3-206-50
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer InsightsTable Notes, Emergent Themes, Shared QuestionsRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes
Tags1 shared
FacilitationCoachingLearning
FacilitationDialogueLarge groupSensemaking
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
LearningDialogueFacilitation
Add more methods