View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Troika Consulting |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Facilitation Barcamp |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-45 min | 60–90 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-30 | 2-8 | 15-200 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationCoachingLearning | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |