View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Troika Consulting |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Facilitation Barcamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-45 min | 30-60 min | 60-90 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-30 | 2-8 | 3-6 | 15-200 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationCoachingLearning | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | FacilitationLarge groupLearning |