methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Troika Consulting.
Facilitation
Troika Consulting
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for Fishbowl Discussion.
Facilitation
Fishbowl Discussion
Purposedifferent
When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-45 min10-20 min je Frage60-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-306-504-108-80
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer InsightsConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning NotesProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentDiscussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions
Tags1 shared
FacilitationCoachingLearning
LearningDialogueFacilitation
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
FacilitationDialogueLarge group
Add more methods