View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Troika Consulting |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Facilitation Barcamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-45 min | 15-45 min | 45-90 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-30 | 1-10 | 8-80 | 15-200 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationCoachingLearning | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | FacilitationLarge groupLearning |