View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Troika Consulting |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |  Innovation Design Charrette |  Knowledge Modeling Peer Instruction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-45 min | 45-90 min | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 10-20 min je Frage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-30 | 8-80 | 10-50 | 6-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Concept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationCoachingLearning | FacilitationDialogueLarge group | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | LearningDialogueFacilitation |