View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Troika Consulting | ![]() UX Design Design Studio | ![]() Facilitation Open Space Technology | ![]() Innovation Design Charrette |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When several designs need to be quickly put in relation to each other, it makes ideas visible and comparable. It encourages early variants instead of long upfront debates. | When a complex topic does not yet have a fitting agenda, Open Space Technology hands topic ownership back to the participants. The format suits questions that only move forward when real interest determines the order. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-45 min | 1-3 h | 0.5-2 Tage | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-30 | 3-8 | 20-500+ | 10-50 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Sketches, Concept Directions, Design Decisions | Session Marketplace, Proceedings, Action Topics | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationCoachingLearning | SketchingCollaborationIdeation | FacilitationLarge groupAutonomy | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation |



