View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Troika Consulting | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-45 min | 1-4 Wochen | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-30 | 6-30 Experten | 15-200 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationCoachingLearning | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |



