View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Troika Consulting | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp | ![]() Innovation Crazy 8s | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-45 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 8-15 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-30 | 15-200 | 1-10 | 8-80 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationCoachingLearning | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | FacilitationDialogueLarge group |



