methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Troika Consulting.
Facilitation
Troika Consulting
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration for Peer Instruction.
Knowledge Modeling
Peer Instruction
Purposedifferent
When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands.When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.Peer Instruction uses group thinking to clarify difficult terms or concepts faster. The method combines individual reflection with social correction and shared precision.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-45 min10-20 min60-120 min10-20 min je Frage
Participantsdifferent
3-304-100+5-126-50
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer InsightsIdea List, Shared Insights, Emergent ThemesRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityConcept Questions, Vote Results, Learning Notes
Tags1 shared
FacilitationCoachingLearning
FacilitationInclusionIdeation
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
LearningDialogueFacilitation
Add more methods