View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Troika Consulting |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Facilitation Barcamp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When someone needs to sort out a concrete work problem, Troika Consulting offers fast peer consulting with a tight focus. The method brings perspectives together without taking responsibility out of the person's hands. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-45 min | 10-20 min | 5-15 min | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 3-30 | 4-100+ | 3-20 | 15-200 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Advice Notes, Next Actions, Peer Insights | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings |
Tags1 shared | FacilitationCoachingLearning | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | FacilitationLarge groupLearning |