View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Innovation TRIZ |  Operations Getting Things Done |  Innovation Contradiction Analysis |  Operations Eat the Frog |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles. | With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory. | When a system should improve while another measure suffers as a result, the method makes the underlying conflict precisely formulable. It separates the desired effect from its side effect. This makes solutions possible that address the contradiction deliberately instead of half-heartedly. | The method protects energy and attention for the task that creates the largest progress and is often postponed. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 h | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 60-120 min | 15-90 min daily |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1 | 2-8 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Contradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution Concepts | Action Lists, Project List, Review Routine | Contradiction Statement, Abstraction Notes, Solution Principles, Concept Ideas | Priority Task, Completion Note, Daily Focus |
Tagsno overlap | InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity | ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution | ContradictionsInnovationProblem solving | PrioritizationProductivityFocusExecution |