methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for TRIZ
Innovation
TRIZ
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration for Root Cause Analysis.
Operations
Root Cause Analysis
Purposedifferent
For technical contradictions or trade-offs, the method looks for solutions that resolve opposing requirements at the same time. It translates limits into an explicit picture of conflict that becomes workable. This produces not just compromises but more elegant principles.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When a problem keeps recurring and the cause stays unclear, the method exposes the underlying mechanism. It separates symptom, guess, and robust explanation from one another.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 h15-30 min30-120 min1-4 h
Participantsdifferent
2-82-62-63-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Contradiction Statement, Inventive Principles, Solution ConceptsRoot cause notes, CountermeasuresObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasProblem Statement, Cause Hypotheses, Confirmed Causes, Action Plan
Tagsno overlap
InnovationProblem solvingContradictionsCreativity
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
LeanObservationProcessOperations
Root causeProblem solvingQualityIncident
Add more methods