methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration of a six-field PESTLE grid
Business Strategy
PESTLE Analysis
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.PESTLE Analysis makes political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental influences visible. The environment of an initiative is thereby read systematically instead of through isolated trends.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-3 h20-45 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question2-10Based on research question2-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAPESTLE Map, External Risks, Strategic QuestionsContent groups, Label set, IA hypothesesGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
StrategyMarketAnalysis
Information architectureNavigationStructure
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Add more methods