methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage120 min initial, dann laufend90-180 min20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question3-63-6Based on research question
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAHEART-GSM Table, DashboardGQM Table, Metric ProfilesContent groups, Label set, IA hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Add more methods