methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview20-45 min
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question10-305-12 InterviewsBased on research question
Formatdifferent
AsyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsContent groups, Label set, IA hypotheses
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Add more methods