methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Context Map workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Domain Modeling
Context Map
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration for Domain Context Map
Domain Modeling
Domain Context Map
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-3 h20-45 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question2-8Based on research question3-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAContext Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary NotesContent groups, Label set, IA hypothesesDomain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership Map
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy
Information architectureNavigationStructure
Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries
Add more methods