methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Scenario Planning method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
Scenario Planning
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage20-45 min0.5-2 Tage1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
Based on research questionBased on research question4-1210-30
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAContent groups, Label set, IA hypothesesScenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust OptionsClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design Recommendations
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
Information architectureNavigationStructure
StrategyUncertaintyPlanning
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
Add more methods