methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration showing three sorted card stacks and an open question about a possible group.
UX Research
Card Sorting
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage20-45 min90-180 min120 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
Based on research questionBased on research question3-63-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAContent groups, Label set, IA hypothesesGQM Table, Metric ProfilesHEART-GSM Table, Dashboard
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
Information architectureNavigationStructure
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Add more methods