View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Tree Testing |  UX Research Card Sorting |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Domain Modeling Domain Context Map |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When content only makes sense internally and users can't find the structure again, card sorting exposes their mental order. Terms, groups, and naming are then aligned with the target group's expectations. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 20-45 min | 1-3 Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | Based on research question | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Content groups, Label set, IA hypotheses | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Domain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership Map |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationFindability | Information architectureNavigationStructure | UX researchObservationContext | Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries |