methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for TOWS Matrix.
Business Strategy
TOWS Matrix
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Paper matrix with six colored hat cards for information, feeling, value, caution, ideas and process control.
Facilitation
Six Thinking Hats
Purposedifferent
The TOWS Matrix connects internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats into action-oriented strategies. It goes a step further than a pure stocktaking.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h60-90 min1-3 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-104-102-84-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
TOWS Matrix, Strategic Options, Priority ActionsProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesPerspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
StrategyAnalysisOptions
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
FacilitationOptionsDecision
Add more methods