methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper timeline with three dates, parallel lanes for work, signals and decisions, and labeled links.
Facilitation
Timeline
Paper illustration of Hooked Model with its method-specific working model.
Growth
Hooked Model
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
A paper-based illustration representing North Star Metric with its core stages and visible working result.
Growth
North Star Metric
Purposedifferent
When a project, incident, or change process is only remembered in fragments, Timeline brings the sequence back into a readable form. It makes turning points, precursors, and after-effects recognizable over the course of time.The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-90 minMultiple workshops over several weeks1-2 h1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
2-122-84-123-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Timeline, Milestones, Insight NotesHooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics checkAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsNorth Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadence
Tagsno overlap
TimelineFacilitationSequence
GrowthBehaviorRetention
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention
Add more methods