methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Time Blocking
Operations
Time Blocking
A paper-based illustration representing North Star Metric with its core stages and visible working result.
Growth
North Star Metric
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
With a calendar that grows on request, the method makes available time explicit again. It combines appointments, focus work, and buffer into a more realistic day structure.When product teams track many metrics, the view of the actual customer outcome easily gets lost. A North Star Metric bundles growth, usage, and value contribution into one signal that makes the system's direction visible.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
15-30 min Planung, laufend1-2 h45-90 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
13-83-84-12
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Blocked Calendar, Capacity View, Focus PlanNorth Star metric, Input metric tree, Measurement cadenceImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementFocus
GrowthMetricsAlignmentRetention
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods