View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Three-Point EstimationLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)Ideal DaysFailure Mode and Effects Analysis
| Criterion | ![]() Decision Making Three-Point Estimation | ![]() Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) | ![]() Agile Ideal Days | ![]() Operations Failure Mode and Effects Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. | For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 10-30 min je Item | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional | 15-60 min | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people | 2-9 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption Notes | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats | FMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation Actions |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationUncertaintyForecasting | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean | EstimationEffortAgile | RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause |



