View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Three Horizons | ![]() Systems Thinking Systems Mapping | ![]() Business Strategy Ansoff Matrix | ![]() Systems Thinking Leverage Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. | Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins. | The Ansoff Matrix organizes growth options by market and product relation. It helps weigh expansion, diversification, and adaptation cleanly against each other. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ | 1-3 h | 45-90 min | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 3-12 | 2-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan | System Map, Dependencies, Leverage Points | Ansoff Matrix, Growth Options, Risk Notes | Leverage Map, Action Strategy |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight | Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange | GrowthStrategyMarketPortfolio | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy |



