View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation 3-Circle Venn Diagram |  Knowledge Modeling IBIS |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When three perspectives matter at the same time, a Three-Circle Venn Diagram shows the overlaps and remainders precisely. It makes visible where shared effect arises and where only a partial perspective applies. | IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-3 h | 1-2 h | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-8 | 4-12 | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Venn Diagram, Overlap Notes, Differentiators | Issue Map, Positions, Argument Notes | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | ComparisonFacilitationAlignment | RationaleKnowledgeDecision | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | SensemakingDecisionRationale |