View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Theory of Constraints |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |  Operations Process Mapping |  Engineering Kanban |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a system that does not get faster despite effort, the method directs attention to the bottleneck. It concentrates improvement on the point that actually limits throughput. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. | When work sits in too many parallel streams, throughput suffers and no one sees the bottlenecks. Kanban makes the flow of work visible and limits overload so a system becomes calmer and more predictable. |
Complexitydifferent | High | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h Analyse, laufend | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend | 1-3 h | Ongoing |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-8 | 3-10 | 2-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Constraint Map, Improvement Plan, Flow Metrics | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog | Kanban board, WIP policies, Flow metrics |
Tagsno overlap | OperationsConstraintsFlowImprovement | ForecastingFlowDelivery | ProcessOperationsImprovement | FlowVisual managementDelivery |