View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Decision Making Argument Mapping |  Architecture Request for Comments |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When statements, evidence, and counterarguments get mixed up, a debate quickly loses its structure. Argument Mapping breaks a thesis down into its reasoning and makes visible what it really rests on. | An RFC clarifies architecture context, options, and consequences. It structures technical context, alternatives, tradeoffs, open questions, and review feedback, and captures the result as an RFC document, reviewer comments, and a decision rationale. | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 1-3 h | 1-3 Wochen vom Draft bis zur Entscheidung | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 1-8 | 3-20 Reviewer | Team-Leads plus Architecture |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Argument Map, Evidence Gaps, Decision Rationale | RFC document, Reviewer comments, Decision rationale, Follow-up ADR or tickets | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | SensemakingDecisionRationale | ArchitectureDecisionAsyncGovernance | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization |