methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper illustration for Trade-off Analysis.
Decision Making
Trade-off Analysis
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of a decision table with criteria rows, weighted ratings, and a narrowly leading alternative.
Decision Making
Decision Matrix
Purposedifferent
When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.With limited resources, quality, speed, cost, and risk almost always compete with each other. Trade-off Analysis makes these tensions explicit and prevents decisions from producing hidden side effects.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When several options collide with several criteria, comparison quickly becomes subjective. A Decision Matrix makes the trade-off visible and brings weighting, criteria, and options into a shared logic.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Half day initial, dann laufend45-120 min1-2 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
Ein Team plus Stakeholder2-84-122-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Team API DocumentTrade-off Matrix, Criteria List, Decision Rationale, Accepted DownsidesAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsDecision Matrix, Scoring Rationale, Selected Option
Tagsno overlap
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
TradeoffsDecisionCriteriaOptions
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
DecisionCriteriaScoringTradeoffs
Add more methods