methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Software Architecture Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Software Architecture Canvas
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.The Software Architecture Canvas reduces a system to the most important architecture decisions, constraints, and interfaces. It is useful when teams need a resilient overall picture quickly.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Half day initial, dann laufend1-2 h1-2 Tage15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
Ein Team plus Stakeholder3-101-41-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Team API DocumentArchitecture Canvas, Goals, Constraints, Quality AttributesArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
CanvasArchitectureAlignmentWorkshop
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods