methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of KPI Tree with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
KPI Tree
Purposedifferent
When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Half day initial, dann laufend120 min initial, dann laufend1-2 h90-180 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
Ein Team plus Stakeholder3-64-123-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Team API DocumentHEART-GSM Table, DashboardAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsKPI Tree, Owner List
Tagsno overlap
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement
Add more methods