View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Team Design Team API | ![]() Facilitation Dot Estimation | ![]() Facilitation Expectation Mapping | ![]() Agile Ideal Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day initial, dann laufend | 5-20 min | 45-90 min | 15-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 3-20 | 3-12 | 2-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Team API Document | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity Caveats |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | EstimationEffortRisk | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | EstimationEffortAgile |



