View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Teach-back |  Delivery Monte Carlo Forecasting |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Delivery Value Stream Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, and Risk Communication. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When delivery work dissolves into wait times, handoffs, and hidden effort, Value Stream Mapping makes the actual flow visible. The method exposes bottlenecks, idle time, and feedback loops so lead time and improvement levers become tangible. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 30-90 min Setup, danach laufend | 20-60 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-8 | 1 | 4-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Forecast Percentiles, Throughput Dataset, Risk Communication | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Current-state map, Future-state map, Bottleneck list |
Tagsno overlap | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | ForecastingFlowDelivery | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | LeanFlowWasteDelivery |