View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Teach-back |  Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique |  Engineering Failure Scenario Analysis |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | In critical processes, it is not enough to plan only for the normal case. Failure Scenario Analysis looks at the path into failure and shows which failures, chains, and control gaps cause the most damage. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 20-60 min | 1-3 h | 45–75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1 | 3-8 | Team members involved |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Failure Scenarios, Risk Notes, Control Gaps, Test and Response Actions | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | FailureResilienceRisk | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam |