View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Teach-back | ![]() Innovation Crazy 8s | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Feynman Technique | ![]() Innovation Brainstorming |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | The Feynman Technique checks understanding by explaining a topic so that it stays easy for others to understand. It makes knowledge gaps visible before they become costly in everyday work. | When a team faces an open question with many obvious directions, the method first creates breadth instead of premature commitment. It separates idea flow from evaluation and makes lines of thought visible, creating a pool for selection and further development. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 5-20 min | 8-15 min | 20-60 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-10 | 1 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Plain-language Explanation, Knowledge Gaps, Study Notes | Idea pool, Theme clusters, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | LearningKnowledgeUnderstanding | BrainstormingIdeationCreativityWorkshopDivergence |



