View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile T-Shirt Sizing |  Operations Process Mapping |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |  Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When effort only needs to be classified roughly, it makes comparability more important than false precision. It helps sort work quickly into manageable sizes. | With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-45 min | 1-3 h | 5-20 min | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 3-10 | 3-20 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Size Buckets, Rough Backlog Map, Split Candidates | Process Map, Handoff List, Improvement Backlog | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileRoadmap | ProcessOperationsImprovement | EstimationEffortRisk | LeanObservationProcessOperations |