View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research Surveys | ![]() Facilitation 3-Circle Venn Diagram | ![]() Innovation Design Sprint | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a topic needs to be validated broadly and many people can answer the same question, surveys gather structured feedback in a scalable form. Answers become comparable and segmentable instead of remaining merely anecdotal. | When three perspectives matter at the same time, a Three-Circle Venn Diagram shows the overlaps and remainders precisely. It makes visible where shared effect arises and where only a partial perspective applies. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 3-14 Tage | 15-45 min | 4-5 Tage | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 50+ | 2-8 | 5-8 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Survey Results, Charts, Segment Insights | Venn Diagram, Overlap Notes, Differentiators | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | QuantitativeResearchValidation | ComparisonFacilitationAlignment | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |



