View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Strategic, Tactical and Operational PlanningRACI Matrix4Ls RetrospectiveResponsibility Poker
| Criterion |  Business Strategy Strategic, Tactical and Operational Planning |  Operations RACI Matrix |  Agile 4Ls Retrospective |  Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | It places decisions and artifacts at the right level. Strategic planning clarifies direction, tactical planning translates it into programs, and operational planning steers concrete processes. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 90-180 min | 45-90 min | 45–75 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 | 2-8 | Team members involved | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Planning Levels Map, Cadence Model, Planning Artifact Inventory | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | CadenceGovernanceExecution | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |