View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Story Points |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Dot Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When size or effort can only be estimated roughly, Dot Estimation condenses the group's experience into a quick range. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as an Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, and Discussion Targets. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | laufend, 1-5 min je Item | 45-90 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 5-20 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | 3-12 | 3-15 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Point Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity Data | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | ROAM Board, Owner List | Effort Heatmap, Risk Signals, Discussion Targets |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileMeasurement | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | EstimationEffortRisk |