View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Story Points |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Product Strategy KPI Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When metrics across the organization drift apart, it arranges drivers and effects under one shared logic. It connects customer value, product logic, and decision priorities. The result is captured as a KPI tree and owner list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | laufend, 1-5 min je Item | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 90-180 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-9 | 4-12 | 3-12 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Point Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity Data | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | KPI Tree, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationAgileMeasurement | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | MetricsStrategyAlignmentMeasurement |