View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue | ![]() Operations RACI Matrix | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective | ![]() Facilitation Responsibility Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | With unclear responsibilities across several roles or areas, the method creates unambiguous accountability logic. It reduces friction because decision, execution, contribution, and information become separately visible. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 2-8 | 4-12 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | RACI Matrix, Responsibility Map, Decision Notes | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Responsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | RolesResponsibilityGovernanceOperations | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation |



