View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Start Stop Continue | ![]() Agile 4Ls Retrospective | ![]() Operations 8D Problem Solving | ![]() Agile Sailboat Retrospective |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time. | For an acute quality or delivery problem, the method structures immediate protection and root cause work together. It keeps the situation stable while the actual cause is investigated cleanly. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-60 min | 45–75 min | 1-6 Wochen | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | Team members involved | 4-10 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | 4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement Actions | 8D Report, Containment Plan, Root Cause Evidence, Corrective Action Plan | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam | QualityProblem solvingRoot cause | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement |



