View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Facilitation Six Thinking Hats |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When a topic gets stuck too quickly in the same thinking mode, Six Thinking Hats deliberately separates the perspectives. This means facts, risks, creativity, and emotional signals get worked through one after another instead of mixed together. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 4-12 | 4-12 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Perspective Notes, Decision Inputs, Action Items | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | FacilitationOptionsDecision | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility |