View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Growth A/B Testing |  Facilitation 3-Circle Venn Diagram |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. | When three perspectives matter at the same time, a Three-Circle Venn Diagram shows the overlaps and remainders precisely. It makes visible where shared effect arises and where only a partial perspective applies. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-90 min | 1-2 h | 1-4 Wochen | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 4-12 | 1-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary | Venn Diagram, Overlap Notes, Differentiators |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation | ComparisonFacilitationAlignment |