View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Stakeholder MappingLASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews)Stakeholder Salience ModelRAID Log
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping | ![]() Architecture LASR (Lightweight Approach for Software Reviews) | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | LASR helps development teams identify where their software falls short of important quality goals and which improvements to consider. A small group with existing system knowledge can make an initial assessment and investigate open questions in more detail. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60–90 min | 3–4 h for initial assessment; preparation and deeper analysis additional | 60-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1 or a small team; particularly suitable for 3–4 people | 3-6 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Lean Mission Statement describing the software’s purpose, Prioritized quality goals and evaluation criteria, Risks and estimated gaps against quality goals, More closely examined findings and open checks | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | ArchitectureQualityRiskAssessmentLean | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |



